The true pT3N0 breast cancer is a fairly rare disease
and studies dedicated to this special group of patients in
the literature are seldom reported. In a study from Finland,
Helintö et al. [
1] reported the frequency of true pathological
T3N0M0 patients as 0.9% among 4190 breast cancer
patients. True pathological T3N0 breast cancer patients in
our series is 9%. Lack of screening programs in addition
to educational and social problems in our country may lead
to this high frequency of patients with large tumors but all
those reasons do not explain the relatively benign nature
of these tumors that they are large enough to be considered
as T3 tumors but without any lymph node metastasis.
The optimal treatment and the role of postmastectomy
XRT in the management of resected T3 pathologically node negative breast cancer is controversial [5]. In one of the
largest studies, Fracchia et al. [6] reported the 10-year
outcome in 488 stage III breast cancer of which 58 were
T3-4N0 patients. In that study 75% of patients with T3-
4N0 tumor were alive at 10 years compared with only 21%
in T3-4 patients with positive axillary lymph nodes.
Two prospective randomized trials addressed the role
of postmastectomy XRT in resected T3 node negative breast
cancer. In the Helsinki trial, Klefstrom et al. [2] analyzed
120 stage III patients comparing XRT alone vs. chemotherapy
(CT) alone vs. combined chemoradiotherapy. Locoregional
recurrence was reported in 2 of the 27 patients with
T3N0 breast cancer who received postmastectomy XRT
compared with 5 of 13 patients who did not. In 40 T3N0
patients in this trial, systemic recurrences were observed
in 30% of the cases compared with 76% in T3N1-2 cases.
In the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82B trial,
Overgaard et al. [3] reported their results in 1708 premenopausal
patients of whom 135 were staged as T3N0. The
10-year overall survival of the 58 patients receiving
CT+XRT was 82% with 3/58 locoregional recurrences.
The remaining 77 cases with T3N0 breast cancer in the
Danish trial were treated with adjuvant CT alone and 10
year survival in this group was reported to be 70% with
17/77 locoregional recurrences. There is no DFS or DMFS
difference in lymph node negative patients in our series no
matter what T stage the patient is (T1-2 vs T3) which may
be due to relatively short follow-up time. Seventeen out of
100 patients in T1-2N0 group received no further systemic
therapy after locoregional treatment. These patients were
with tumors of 1 cm or less in diameter without any lymph
node metastases and can be considered as a very favorable
group with no need for further systemic treatment. Only
1 patient in the T3N0 group experienced locoregional
recurrence located on chest wall. Since all patients in this
group with T3 tumors received irradiation either to chest
wall or breast, we can not make a conclusion about the
possible beneficial role of postmastectomy chest wall XRT.
Although we do not have phase III trials dedicated to this
pT3N0 group of patients, the results of Helsinki and Danish
trials in addition to our clinical experience lead us to believe
that postmastectomy XRT is essential.
Breast cancer recurrence and survival rates are significantly
influenced by the pathologic status of the axillary
lymph nodes. The total number of the positive nodes is the
major determinant of the risks of locoregional recurrence, distant metastases and breast cancer death [7-10]. Commonly
accepted subdivisions of node positive patients with prognostic
significance include the categories of 1-3 positive
nodes vs. 4 or more [11-13]. For patients with 1-3 positive
axillary lymph nodes, who receive adjuvant chemotherapy
and/or XRT, locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis
rates at 10 years are reported to be in the range of 7- 30%
and 17-30%, respectively; whereas in patients having more
than 3 axillary lymph nodes involved, these rates are in the
range of 14-42% for locoregional recurrences and 23-46%
for distant metastases [3,9,10]. For patients with operable
locally advanced tumors, results of a randomized trial by
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [14] showed that the
increased number of metastatic axillary lymph nodes
significantly increased the patients’ risk of relapse by 79%
and risk of death by 66% at a median follow up time of
9.1 years. Since there is a great heterogeneity of the number
of the axillary lymph nodes removed during dissection, we
chose to classify the axillary lymph nodes with LNR rather
than the crude number of metastatic lymph nodes in patients
with adequate axillary dissection and in the analysis of
pT3N1 breast cancer patients in our series, a subset of
patients with less than 25% lymph node involvement
showed a prognosis equally favorable as patients with
pT3N0 disease in terms of DFS, DMFS and LRRFS. The
median number of metastatic lymph nodes in 1-25% LNR
group in our series was 2. Prognostically these patients can
be accepted as having less than 4 metastatic lymph nodes
and the short term results of our study, in our opinion,
support the literature in terms of classifying node positive
patients according to the number of metastatic axillary
lymph nodes, to a better prognosis of 1-3 positive lymph
nodes and unfavorable prognosis in 4 or more metastatic
lymph node group.
With a median follow up time of 38 months, only 2
patients, 1/40 in pT3N0 and 1/63 in less than 25% LNR
group, developed locoregional recurrence. According to
our treatment protocol, XRT to chest wall was routinely
applied to all T3 cases and in case of inadequate dissection
or when equal or more than 3 lymph nodes contained
metastatic cancer, SCF and posterior axillary fields were
also irradiated. Despite the short follow-up time, the low
locoregional recurrence rates suggest that chest wall XRT
can be an effective adjuvant locoregional treatment after
surgery in T3N0 and T3N1 with less than 25% LNR patients
provided that an adequate axillary dissection has been
performed.
In conclusion, the preliminary results of our study give
us an impression that pT3N0 and a favorable group of
T3N1 patients may have a fairly good short-term outcome
that is comparable to T1-2N0 patients. Longer follow-up time of at least 5 years will answer the question whether
this favorable outcome will continue or not. The need for
routine postoperative chest wall irradiation in these patients,
remains to be tested in a prospective randomized trial.