[ Main Page | Editorial Board | About | Instructions ]
[ Table of Contents | Archive | Archive Search | Online Submission | Sponsor | E-mail ]

Turkish Journal of Cancer
2009, Volume 39, Number 2, Page(s) 045-050
[ Summary ] [ PDF ] [ Similar Articles ] [ Mail to Editor ]
Comparison and evaluation of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR tumor markers in pleural fluid cytology from metastatic breast cancer as a diagnostic tool
SERPİL OĞUZTÜZÜN1, MERAL ATAY2, MURAT KILIÇ1, MÜZEYYEN ÖZHAVZALI3, ZİYA ATAY2
1Kırıkkale University, Department of Biology, Kırıkkale-Turkey
2Cytopathology Institute, Hannover-Germany
3Kırıkkale University, Department of Mathematics, Kırıkkale-Turkey
Keywords: Pleura, metastasis, invasive breast cancer, estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, c-erbB-2, CA 15-3, cytology, immunocytochemistry
Summary
This study has been conducted to determine the diagnostic value of CA 15-3 in detecting metastatic breast carcinoma in pleural fluid. The material studied consisted of 115 malignant pleural effusions from invasive breast cancer patients. Expressions of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) were studied using immunocytochemistry. Of the cases studied, 115 were evaluated for CA 15-3, 70 for c-erbB-2, 100 for ER and 97 for PR. The 94% of the breast cancer cases studied showed a positive reaction with CA 15-3, while 31% for c-erbB-2, 20% for ER and 9% for PR were positive (p<0.01). The sensitivities of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR were 94%, 31%, 20% and 9%, respectively, for metastatic breast carcinoma. Our results indicate that CA 15-3 has the highest sensitivity for diagnosing malignant breast carcinomas in pleural fluids. [Turk J Cancer 2009;39(2):45-50]
  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Introduction
    Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy affecting women in industrialized countries. It is estimated that 4.4 million women who have had breast cancer diagnosed within the last 5 years are alive. Because of the growing incidence rates, there would be around 1.4 million new cases in 2010 worldwide[1]. Breast cancer metastasizes most frequently to axillary lymph nodes, but any organ may be involved. Metastatic spread to serosal surfaces involves primarily the pleural cavity, where breast cancer is the etiology of approximately 25% of malignant effusions[2,3]. However, breast carcinoma metastasis may be infrequently found in the pericardial and peritoneal cavity as well[4]. Involvement of the pleural cavity by breast carcinoma may occur at any point in time of clinical course and may be the sole manifestation of metastatic disease[5]. It portends an extremely poor prognosis, with a median survival of 5 and 11 months in two series[5,6].

    Despite the magnitude of the clinical problem, studies of the biology of breast cancer have focused exclusively on primary tumors and solid metastases. Consequently, the biological characteristics of breast carcinoma cells in effusions have been poorly characterized.

    CA 15-3 is an antigen expressed in benign and malignant breast ductal epithelium. Antibodies against CA 15-3 have been used as possible serum markers of occult and recurrent breast carcinoma[7,8]. CA 15-3 has also been studied as a serologic test for breast carcinoma in pleural fluid[9]. Immunohistochemical studies using second generation CA 15-3 antibody showed promising results in terms of detecting adenocarcinoma in body cavity effusions[10].

    In this study, the sensitivities of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) at the time of detection of metastatic breast carcinoma in pleural fluid were analyzed.

  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Material and Methods
    Cases
    The cytological files of the Hannover Cytopathology Institute were reviewed in August, 2007. The 115 pleural fluids were collected from 115 patients who were diagnosed with metastatic breast carcinoma. Their medical records were reviewed to verify that the cases were of breast carcinoma. Slides that were stained previously by routine May Grunwald Giemsa method were retrieved for each patient. The diagnosis of breast carcinoma based on cytomorphology was confirmed. The sensitivities of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR in pleural fluid samples for metastatic breast carcinomas were calculated.

    Immunocytochemistry procedure
    Cytological smears were prepared by standard cytologic method. The slides were hydrated in decreasing ethanol solutions. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with hydrogen peroxidase for 3 minutes. The slides were rinsed in distilled water, and then incubated with the biotin blocking system (Dako) prior to application of the primary antibody. The antibodies used were as follows: CA 15-3 (1:100, clone Df-3, Dako), c-erbB-2 (1:100, polyclonal, Dako), ER (1:50, clone 1D5, Dako) and PR (1:50, polyclonal, Dako). Monoclonal antibodies were incubated with the samples for one hour. The slides were then rinsed in phosphate buffer, and then incubated for 25 minutes with the linking solution (LSAB+ kit; Dako; biotinylated antimouse, antirabbit, and antigoat). This was followed by a rinse in phosphate buffer and incubation with streptavidin peroxidase for 25 minutes. After rinsing in buffer, the slides were submerged in DAB or AEC as a chromogen for 5 minutes. The slides were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxiline. The intensity of staining was graded on the following scale: 0 (absent), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate), and 3+ (strong). All material was evaluated blindly by two observers. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-squared test and the orthogonal test. They were used to determine statistical significance.

  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Results
    Immunoreactivity for CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR were determined for neoplastic cells in a total of 115 cases of metastatic breast carcinoma from pleural fluids. Overall results are summarized in table 1.

    Table 1: Staining patterns of malignant pleural effusions for CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER, PR

    For all metastatic breast carcinomas studied, 108 (94%) of the cases exhibited CA 15-3 immunostaining (Figure 1). The staining was predominantly cytoplasmic. Although there was membranous staining present, it was usually in the form of darker staining relative to the cytoplasmic staining. The sensitivity of CA 15-3 for these malignant breast carcinomas was 94%.

    Fig 1: Immunocytochemistry of CA 15-3 showing moderate cytoplasmic and membranous staining in breast cancer cells (Pleural fluid, x600)

    We also examined c-erbB-2 reactivity in cytologic specimens (Figure 2) derived from metastatic breast carcinomas and detected positivity for most neoplastic cells in 15 (21%) of 70 cases, all of which exhibited a diffuse membrane staining pattern.

    Fig 2: Immunocytochemistry of C-erbB-2 showing moderate cytoplasmic staining in breast cancer cells (Pleural fluid, x600)

    Of 100 cases of metastatic breast carcinoma, neoplastic cells in 20 cases (20%) exhibited nuclear reactivity for ER protein (Figure 3). Detection of PR (Figure 4) was observed in 9 (9%) of 97 cases.

    Fig 3: Immunocytochemistry of ER showing moderate cytoplasmic staining in breast cancer cells (Pleural fluid, x600)

    Fig 4: Immunocytochemistry of PR showing moderate cytoplasmic staining in breast cancer cells (Pleural fluid, x600)

    There was a significant difference between CA 15- 3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR expressions in metastatic breast carcinoma (P<0.01; Chi-squared test). The sensitivities of CA 15-3, c-erbB-2, ER and PR as a marker for metastatic breast carcinoma were 94%, 31%, 25% and 9%, respectively. CA 15-3 had the highest sensitivity of the malignant breast carcinomas studied, with a sensitivity of 94%.

  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Disscussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Discussion
    Breast cancer is the most common cause of malignant pleural effusions in women, followed closely by lung adenocarcinoma. Approximately half of the patients with disseminated breast cancer develop a malignant pleural effusion at some time during their illness, while the most common tumor to initially manifest as a malignant pleural effusion is lung carcinoma[11]. As with nodal and soft tissue metastases, the determination of the primary tumor site in cases of malignant effusion can be facilitated by immunoreactivity by various markers. In tissue sections, the identification of metastatic breast carcinoma has been greatly enhanced by the use of antibodies directed against ER and PR, which have been demonstrated to be useful markers for breast carcinoma[12].

    Immunohistochemistry is proven to be useful in the diagnosis, classification and prognostication of neoplasms, making it an ideal tool for the study of effusions, especially in difficult cases. CA 15-3 is an antigen localized at the luminal aspect of breast epithelium. It has been used as a serum marker of occult and recurrent breast carcinoma[7,8]. It has also been used in numerous studies to help diagnose malignant pleural effusions[9].

    Since the early 1990s, antibodies against CA 15-3 have been developed as possible serum markers of occult or recurrent breast carcinoma[7,8]. Similarly, CA 15-3 has been examined as a serologic test for breast carcinoma in pleural fluid[9]. Histologic studies have centered on the specificity of CA 15-3 for breast carcinoma in metastatic carcinomas or its sensitivity for detecting micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes[13,14]. These reports indicate that CA 15-3 is sensitive, but not specific, for breast carcinoma. To our knowledge, no recently published work has examined CA 15-3 as an immunochemical stain to detect carcinoma in body cavity effusions, although Szpak and coworkers[15] used their own clone to the DF3 epitope of CA 15-3 for this purpose in 1984. Given its high sensitivity for carcinomas, we evaluated a second generation CA 15-3 for its utility to detect breast carcinoma in pleural effusions.

    In this study we have confirmed that CA 15-3 is a sensitive tumor marker for breast carcinoma, with a sensitivity of 94%, while Huang et al.[16] and Geraghty and coworkers[17] have reported 91% and 88% for the sensitivity of CA 15-3, respectively. Fehm et al.[18] found that positivity rate of CA 15-3 serum levels was 51% in metastatic breast cancer. Zimmerman et al.[19] reported that CA 15-3 was an immunostain with high specificity and sensitivity for breast carcinoma cases (97%) in cell block material from effusions. In conclusion, CA 15-3 shows remarkable potential in diagnosing metastatic breast carcinoma in cytologic specimens.

    It is well recognized that serial radiologic studies, including bone scans, ultrasonography, and plain radiographs, are of limited value in the detection of occult metastatic breast carcinoma. Measurement of tumor marker levels is an attractive alternative screening technique for metastatic breast carcinoma, because it is noninvasive, inexpensive and relatively simple to perform. Carcinoembryonic antigen is the most widely used marker in monitoring the development and clinical course of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma[20]. The poor sensitivity of this marker, however, limits its usefulness, because only 40-70% of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma have increased levels[21-24]. CA 15-3 is more specific for breast cancer and is also more sensitive in patients with advanced disease[25].

    Hormone receptors and c-erbB-2 are established molecular prognostic markers in breast cancer[26,27]. They are often targeted with therapeutic intention in both localized and metastatic breast cancer, including in the presence of malignant effusion. Davidson and coworkers[28] reported that significantly reduced ER and PR expression was seen in effusions compared with primary tumors, with opposite findings for c-erbB-2 which was highest in effusions and lower expression in primary tumors.

    Ali et al.[29] and other investigators have reported increased soluble c-erbB-2 in the plasma or serum of 20-30% of patients with metastatic breast cancer[30-32]. Bozzetti et al.[33] reported that c-erbB-2 status was mostly stable in primary breast carcinoma and in the corresponding distant metastatic sites on cytologic material. We reported that 21% of breast carcinomas cases showed positive staining for c-erbB-2 in this paper. Lee et al.[34] evaluated the hormonal receptors for ER and PR for cytology cell block preparations from 96 effusion specimens. They reported that 21 (72%) were reactive for ER, 15 (52%) for PR, and 13 (45%) for both receptors. They suggested that the detection of ER and PR in metastatic adenocarcinoma from pleural effusions could distinguish breast from lung primary sites. Several studies have shown that metastatic breast cancer patients with a high disease burden have a poorer prognosis[35,36]. It is difficult to quantify disease burden with imaging studies, and some patients have evaluable but not measurable disease. Pleural effusion CA 15-3 is used as a surrogate marker of disease bulk to monitor metastatic breast cancer patients undergoing treatment and for the preclinical detection of tumor recurrence. One report has shown that increased HER-2/neu is associated with both decreased response rate and shorter time of survival[37].

    In this study, we evaluated c-erbB-2 status on metastases from breast carcinoma patients performed on cytologic material. Since the advent of trastuzumab, the characterization of the molecular profile in metastatic disease has become increasingly important for targeted therapy selection.

  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Conclusion
    CA 15-3 is a sensitive and specific marker for metastatic breast carcinomas in pleural effusions. It shows particular potential in the setting of metastatic breast carcinoma. Further study is needed to fully assess the diagnostic value of CA 15-3 in pleural effusions.
  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • References

    1) Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.

    2) Hausheer FH, Yarbro JW. Diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion. Semin Oncol 1985;12:54-75.

    3) Martinez-Moragon E, Aparicio J, Sanchis J, et al. Malignant pleural effusion: prognostic factors for survival and response to chemical pleurodesis in a series of 120 cases. Respiration 1998;65:108-13.

    4) Wilkes JD, Fidias P, Vaickus L, et al. Malignancyrelated pericardial effusion. 127 cases from the Roswell Park Center Institute. Cancer (Phila) 1995;76:1377-87.

    5) Dieterich M, Goodman SN, Rojas-Corona RR, et al. Multivariate analysis of prognostic features in malignant pleural effusions from breast cancer patients. Acta Cytol 1994;38:945-52.

    6) Banerjee AK, Willetts I, Robertson JF, et al. Pleural effusion in breast cancer: a review of the Nottingham experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 1994;20:33-6.

    7) Nicolini A, Anselmi L, Michelassi C, et al. Prolonged survival by ‘early' salvage treatment of breast cancer patients: A retrospective 6-year study. Eur J Cancer 1997;76:1106-11.

    8) Ohuchi N, Sato S, Akimoto M, et al. The correlation between the immunohistochemical expression of DF3 antigen and serum CA 15-3 in breast cancer patients. Jpn J Surg 1991;21:129-37.

    9) Shimokata K, Totani Y, Nakanishi K, et al. Diagnostic value of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) detected by monoclonal antibodies (115D8 and DF3) in exudative pleural effusions. Eur Respir J 1988;1:341-4.

    10) Zimmerman RL, Fogt F, Goonewardene S. Diagnostic value of a second generation CA 15-3 antibody to detect adenocarcinoma in body cavity effusions. Cancer 2000;25:230-4.

    11) Monte SA, Ehya H, Lang WR. Positive effusion cytology as the initial presentation of malignancy. Acta Cytol 1987;31:448-52.

    12) Kaufmann O, Kother S, Dietel M. Use of antibodies against estrogen and progesterone receptors to identify metastatic breast and ovarian carcinomas by conventional immunohistochemical and tyramide signal amplification methods. Mod Pathol 1998;11:357-63.

    13) Brown RW, Campagna LB, Dunn JK, et al. Immunohistochemical identification of tumor markers in metastatic adenocarcinoma: a diagnostic adjunct in the determination of primary site. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;107:12-9.

    14) Byrne J, Horgas PG, England S, et al. A preliminary report on the usefulness of monoclonal antibodies to CA 15-3 and MCA in the detection of micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes draining primary breast carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1992;28:658-60.

    15) Szpak CA, Johnston VW, Lottich SC, et al. Patterns of reactivity of four novel monoclonal antibodies (B72.3, DF3, B1.1, B6.2) with cells in malignant and benign effusions. Acta Cytol 1984;28:356-67.

    16) Huang Y, Zimmerman RL, Bibbo M. Diagnostic value of CA 15-3 antibody in detecting metastatic adenocarcinoma. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2004;26:259-62.

    17) Geraghty JG, Coveney EC, Sherry F, et al. CA 15-3 in patients with locoregional and metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 1992;70:2831-4.

    18) Fehm T, Jager W, Kramer S, et al. Prognostic significance of serum Her2 and CA 15-3 at the time of diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2004;24:1987-92.

    19) Zimmerman RL, Fogt F, Goonewardene S. Diagnostic value of a second generation CA 15-3 antibody to detect adenocarcinoma in body cavity effusions. Cancer Cytopathol 2000;90:230-4.

    20) Tondini C, Hayes DF, Gelman R, et al. Comparison of CA 15-3 and CEA in monitoring the clinical course of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 1988;48:4107-12.

    21) Tormey DC, Waalkes TP, Synder JJ, et al. Biological markers in breast carcinoma. III. Clinical correlations with CEA. Cancer 1977;39:2397-404.

    22) Hayes DF, Zurawski NR, Kufe DW. Comparison of circulating CA 15-3 and CEA in patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:1542-50.

    23) Tormey DC, Waalkes TP. Clinical correlation between CEA and breast cancer. Cancer 1978;42:1507-11.

    24) Lopringi CL, Tormey DC, Rasmussen P, et al. Prospective evaluation of CEA levels and alternating chemotherapeutic regimens in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1986;4:45-56.

    25) Colomer R, Ruibal A, Sahador L. Circulating tumor marker levels in advanced breast carcinoma correlate with the extent of metastatic disease. Cancer 1989;64:1674-81.

    26) Mori I, Yang Q, Kakudo K. Predictive and prognostic markers for invasive breast cancer. Pathol Int 2002;52:186-94.

    27) Mirza AN, Mirza NQ, Vlastos G, et al. Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and followup more than 5 years. Ann Surg 2002;235:10-26.

    28) Davidson B, Konstantinovsky S, Nielsen S, et al. Altered expression of metastasis-associated and regulatory molecules in effusions from breast cancer patients: a novel model for tumor progression. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7335-46.

    29) Ali SM, Leitzel K, Chinchilli VM, et al. Relationship of serum HER-2/neu and serum CA 15-3 in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clin Chem 2002;48:1314-20.

    30) Mori S, Mori Y, Mukaiyama T, et al. In vitro and in vivo release of soluble ERBB-2 protein from human carcinoma cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 1990;81:489-94.

    31) Carney WP, Hamer PJ, Petit D, et al. Detection and quantitation of the human neu oncoprotein. J Tumor Marker Oncol 1991;6:53-72.

    32) Leitzel K, Teramoto Y, Sampson E, et al. Elevated soluble c-erbB-2 antigen levels in the serum and effusions of a proportion of breast cancer patients J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1436-43.

    33) Bozzetti C, Personeni N, Nizzoli R, et al. HER-2/neu amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in cytologic samples from distant metastatic sites of breast carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2003;99:310-5.

    34) Lee BH, Hecht JL, Pinkus JL, et al. WT1, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor as markers for breast or ovarian primary sites in metastatic adenocarcinoma to body fluids. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;117:745-50.

    35) Ravdin PM, Green S, Dorr TM, et al. Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor levels in estrogen receptor positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1284-91.

    36) Abrams J, Aisner J, Cirrincione C, et al. Doseresponse trial of megestrol acetate in advanced breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B phase III study. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:64-73.

    37) Leitzel K, Teramoto Y, Konrad K, et al. Elevated serum c-erbB-2 antigen levels and decreased response to hormone therapy of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:1129-35.

  • Top
  • Introduction
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • [ Top ] [ Summary ] [ PDF ] [ Similar Articles ] [ Mail to Editor ]
    Turkish Journal of Cancer web sitesi Novartis Onkoloji'nin karşılıksız eğitim katkılarıyla hazırlanmıştır.
    [ Main Page | Editorial Board | About | Instructions ]
    [ Table of Contents | Archive | Archive Search | Online Submission | E-mail ]